Cited 2 times since 2004 (0.1 per year) source: EuropePMC European journal of gynaecological oncology, Volume 25, Issue 6, 1 1 2004, Pages 677-681 Management of patients with two consecutive ASC-US smears. Bekkers RL, Hanselaar AG, Melchers WJ, van Schaik JH, Boonstra H, Massuger LF
Introduction
To determine whether aggressive or expectative management of patients after two consecutive smears with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance is preferable. To determine whether triage with high-risk human papillomavirus will identify all patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 and 3.
Methods
140 of 282 patients referred for colposcopy with two consecutive smears with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance were only treated when abnormalities suggestive of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia were present at colposcopy. The other 142 patients underwent excision of all detected colposcopic abnormalities. Both groups were compared regarding the final cytological follow-up, the number of diathermy loop excisions, and the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Retrospectively, the outcome of triage with high-risk human papillomavirus in the first group was investigated.
Results
There was no significant difference in final cytological follow-up between patients managed by expectative or by aggressive colposcopic management. Significantly less diathermy loop excisions (p < 0.001) are performed in case of expectative management. The sensitivity, specificity, negative- and positive predictive values of triage with high-risk human papillomavirus detection were comparable with those of colposcopy alone.
Conclusions
Patients referred with two consecutive ASC-US smears may be followed with an expectative colposcopic management and cytological follow-up. Triage with high-risk human papillomavirus will reduce the number of referrals and colposcopies, but (cytological) follow-up remains necessary in all high-risk human papillomavirus negative patients as well.
