Cited 42 times since 2007 (2.3 per year) source: EuropePMC Heart (British Cardiac Society), Volume 93, Issue 8, 20 3 2007, Pages 922-927 Sirolimus and paclitaxel provoke different vascular pathological responses after local delivery in a murine model for restenosis on underlying atherosclerotic arteries. Pires NM, Eefting D, de Vries MR, Quax PH, Jukema JW

Background

Drug-eluting stents (DES) have been introduced successfully in clinical practice to prevent post-angioplasty restenosis. Nevertheless, concerns about the safety of DES still exist.

Objective

To investigate the vascular pathology and transcriptional responses to sirolimus and paclitaxel in a murine model for restenosis on underlying diseased atherosclerotic arteries.

Methods

Atherosclerotic lesions were induced by placement of a perivascular cuff around the femoral artery of hypercholesterolaemic ApoE*3-Leiden transgenic mice. Two weeks later these cuffs were replaced either by sirolimus- or paclitaxel-eluting cuffs. The vascular pathological effects were evaluated after two additional weeks.

Results

Both anti-restenotic compounds significantly inhibited restenotic lesion progression on the atherosclerotic plaques. Vascular histopathological analyses showed that local delivery of sirolimus has no significant adverse effects on vascular disease. Conversely, high dosages of paclitaxel significantly increased apoptosis, internal elastic lamina disruption, and decreased medial and intimal smooth muscle cells and collagen content. Moreover, transcriptional analysis by real-time RT-PCR showed an increased level of pro-apoptotic mRNA transcripts (FAS, BAX, caspase 3) in paclitaxel-treated arteries.

Conclusions

Sirolimus and paclitaxel are effective in preventing restenosis. Sirolimus has no significant effect on arterial disease. In contrast, paclitaxel at high concentration demonstrated adverse vascular pathology and transcriptional responses, suggesting a narrower therapeutic range of this potent drug. Since the use of overlapping stents is becoming more common in DES technology, this factor is important, given that higher dosages of paclitaxel may lead to increased apoptosis in the vessel wall and, consequently, to a more unstable phenotype of the pre-existing atherosclerotic lesion.

Heart. 2007 4;93(8):922-927