Cited 38 times since 2012 (2.8 per year) source: EuropePMC The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, Volume 67, Issue 7, 20 3 2012, Pages 1775-1780 Nosocomial transmission of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Danish Hospitals. Hetem DJ, Westh H, Boye K, Jarløv JO, Bonten MJ, Bootsma MC
Objectives
The emergence of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) has changed the epidemiology of MRSA infections worldwide. In contrast to hospital-associated MRSA (HA-MRSA), CA-MRSA more frequently affects healthy individuals, both with and without recent healthcare exposure. Despite obvious epidemiological differences, it is unknown whether differences in nosocomial transmissibility exist. We have, therefore, quantified the transmissibility, expressed by the single admission reproduction number (R(A)), of CA-MRSA and HA-MRSA in hospital settings in Denmark.
Methods
MRSA index cases and secondary cases were investigated in four hospitals in the Copenhagen area. Index cases were defined as non-isolated, non-screened patients with MRSA, and secondary cases were defined as persons carrying MRSA isolates-identical to that of the corresponding index-as identified through contact screening. CA-MRSA and HA-MRSA were categorized upon genotyping [CA-MRSA: t008-ST8, PVL+; t019-ST30, PVL+; t127-ST1, PVL+; t044-ST80, PVL+; and their related spa types; and HA-MRSA: all other (where ST stands for sequence type and PVL stands for Panton-Valentine leucocidin)]. A mathematical model was applied to determine the genotype-specific transmission rate (i.e. R(A)) of CA-MRSA and HA-MRSA strains.
Results
During the 7 year study period there were 117 MRSA index cases with subsequent post-contact screening (of 1108 patients and healthcare workers), revealing 22 outbreaks with a total of 52 secondary patients. R(A) values were 0.07 (95% CI 0.00-0.28) and 0.65 (95% CI 0.48-0.84) for CA-MRSA and HA-MRSA, respectively.
Conclusions
In four Danish hospitals the nosocomial transmission rate of CA-MRSA was 9.3 times lower than that of HA-MRSA.
