Cited 2 times since 2019 (0.4 per year) source: EuropePMC Annals of surgery, Volume 270, Issue 5, 1 1 2019, Pages 930-936 Objective Assessment of Fitness to Perform (FTOP) After Surgical Night Shifts in the Netherlands: An Observational Study Using the Validated FTOP Self-test in Daily Surgical Practice. Tummers FHMP, Huizinga CRH, Stockmann HBAC, Hamming JF, Cohen AF, van der Bogt KEA, FTOP Collaborators*
Background
Surgical skills and decision making are influenced by alertness, reaction time, eye-hand coordination, and concentration. Night shift might impair these functions but it is unclear to what extent. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a night shift routinely impairs the surgeon's fitness to perform and whether this reaches a critical limit as compared to relevant frames of reference.
Methods
Consultants (n = 59) and residents (n = 103) conducted fitness to perform measurements at precall, postcall, and noncall moments. This validated self-test consists of an adaptive tracker that is able to objectively measure alertness, reaction time, concentration, and eye-hand coordination, and multiple visual analog scales to subjectively score alertness. Results are compared to sociolegal (ethanol) and professional (operative skills) frames of reference that refer to a decrease under the influence of 0.06% ethanol.
Results
Residents spent 1.7 call hours asleep on average as compared to 5.4 for consultants. Subjective alertness decreased in residents after night shifts (-13, P < 0.001) but not in consultants (-1.2, P = NS). The overnight difference in tracker score was -1.17 (P < 0.001) for residents and 0.46 (P = NS) for surgeons. Postcall subjective alertness only correlated to objective alertness in consultants. For residents, hours slept on-call correlated to objective alertness. For consultants, subsequent night calls significantly correlated to objective alertness, with the third subsequent call related to performance below the reference.
Conclusions
Consultants remain fit to perform after night call, but subsequent calls may compromise clinical activities. This study provides insight and awareness of individual performance with clear frames of reference.
