Cited 4 times since 2022 (1.6 per year) source: EuropePMC Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Volume 80, Issue 5, 1 1 2022, Pages 527-544 Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Hemodynamics: Definitions, Outcomes, and Evidence Gaps: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. Herrmann HC, Pibarot P, Wu C, Hahn RT, Tang GHL, Abbas AE, Playford D, Ruel M, Jilaihawi H, Sathananthan J, Wood DA, De Paulis R, Bax JJ, Rodes-Cabau J, Cameron DE, Chen T, Del Nido PJ, Dweck MR, Kaneko T, Latib A, Moat N, Modine T, Popma JJ, Raben J, Smith RL, Tchetche D, Thomas MR, Vincent F, Yoganathan A, Zuckerman B, Mack MJ, Leon MB, Heart Valve Collaboratory
A virtual workshop was organized by the Heart Valve Collaboratory to identify areas of expert consensus, areas of disagreement, and evidence gaps related to bioprosthetic aortic valve hemodynamics. Impaired functional performance of bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement is associated with adverse patient outcomes; however, this assessment is complicated by the lack of standardization for labelling, definitions, and measurement techniques, both after surgical and transcatheter valve replacement. Echocardiography remains the standard assessment methodology because of its ease of performance, widespread availability, ability to do serial measurements over time, and correlation with outcomes. Management of a high gradient after replacement requires integration of the patient's clinical status, physical examination, and multimodality imaging in addition to shared patient decisions regarding treatment options. Future priorities that are underway include efforts to standardize prosthesis sizing and labelling for both surgical and transcatheter valves as well as trials to characterize the consequences of adverse hemodynamics.
